That sounds good. By following those steps, are you satisfied with the number of reads you retained for the analyses? Also, do the taxonomies assigned make sense to you? I would keep that output if both answers are "Yes".
If all reads from different studies were trimmed using the same mock primers and merged with VSEARCH (except already merged) and then denoised with Deblur, it should make ASVs directly comparable between the studies that you selected. I would keep that information in the metadata file to check the effect on beta diversity. I would definitely check how PCoA plots look like, and account for study/original primer effects in stat analyses.
To be honest, I am not a big fan of network analyses, so my experience with that is not sufficient to recommend the best tool and practices.
But you can check :