Performance and running time of classify-consensus-blast+

Hi @steff1088,
Your workflow looks correct to me; there is also a community tutorial on OTU picking here that may be useful in case you have not already seen it.

:heart:

I think not, since this is open reference and many of the OTUs will have no associated SILVA ID/taxon. If you used closed reference, that should be possible.

You are using the currently recommended workaround but just FYI soon that feature table could be passed to filter-seqs directly. See this issue to track progress.

correct

Yes, as long as these OTUs correspond to the 16Sonly_consensus_taxonomy_7_levels.qza.

Correct! and all other downstream analyses.

I hope that helps! Let us know if you run into any trouble (probably in a separate thread).

Happy QIIMEing :sun_with_face:

2 Likes