Hello,
I'm having difficulties understanding ANCOM output (using Qiime2-2017.10). The ancom.csv shows true for all features in the "reject null hypothesis" column while the W-stats show 0 for most of the features. Does it mean that all of the features are differentially abundant (highly unlikely) even though W = 0?
Here is a snapshot from ancom.csv :
Reject null hypothesis W
3d80710fb18afb303baf125753fd7ac8 True 0
d55aec9ec60a4e3097c3c3953dae8773 True 1
f80a17436037d706dc728dd265b7c21e True 2
f5487404313a4fb57bc3489c167e9a37 True 0
b3fef1e26b7b6ac20847ede4da68547a True 0
ba53aaf1e742e7d9bf5d5f336ca52ca9 True 0
d3211b7a04e5fb36a383450b8f5710e2 True 0
08c92baa0290e451ea255f6020e44739 True 1
6bc890a2012bca332b9d5c43905d1aae True 0
3af2197bbd2daf9be46127b58559c91f True 3
41b518f17927240fdfd1465cd351afc4 True 0
10df701d47286a6ed30c544e219c87f4 True 1
2eb7bab7b0af702e4f18358968a8f7ff True 0
7a08a37eff6224b432a537907a0cec2c True 0
27e5a0119bf0f99608903f79f07ce884 True 0
310e1b0125888ac49bf01d4fc73500d5 True 0
1141f30eddb626a3a1151a19445eadfe True 0
c2cac7ce4200877d49ef4a0f53183000 True 0
Thanks in advance!