In the denoising step using dada2 i have set forward 301 and reverse 260 for truncating. And I got the following denoising stats:
Here the percentage of input passed filter and input merged were too low. So one of my colleague suggested me to take forward 290 and reverse 280 for truncating but still the same trend has been noticed:
I am attaching the quality plot for your reference: paired-end-demux.qzv (314.8 KB). This plot is before trimming adapters and barcodes.
But after trimming those quality has been improved it seems. paired-end-demux.qzv (317.2 KB) . So I have used the later one quality plot for denoising step.
So please help us to improve the denoising stats so that we can move ahead for further analysis.
Thank you.
So @colinbrislawn could you please suggest how much should I set parameter for trim and truncate length for forward and reverse reads so that I can get input filtered and merged stats to the maximum percentage.
Thank you