Strange taxanomy based on Silva database

Interesting... indeed this appears to exist in SILVA 138.1:

However, it does also exist in the GTDB taxonomy, as of R89, but not later releases:

In later releases of GTDB it is corrected to "Midichloriaceae".

So this is probably an issue of SILVA adopting the GTDB taxonomy but being slightly behind the latest GTDB release...

2 Likes

Thank you very much for the check, yes it's probably as you say....they corrected the error in the latest release of GTDB but SILVA is still behind...

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 31 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.