You used subject-id as both the individual-id-column (which is correct) and the group-column (which should specify which treatment-group the subjects are in: FMT or control)
Thank you for your help. When I changed the group_column from subject-id to treatment (which makes more sense), I received the message: Plugin error from longitudinal:
State 0.0 is not represented by any members of donor group in metadata. Consider using a different group_column or state value.*
That is true as there is only -1 for week in donor. How do I solve this problem? Do I exclude the donor group? Thanks again!
and I get a plugin error which says ‘subject-id is not a column in your metadata’. I think there is a problem with my filtering but I don’t know what I’ve done wrong.
Thank you so much @Nicholas_Bokulich!! I am trying to teach myself so it is a bit of a learning curve!!
So when I input the sample metadata file instead of my filtered feature table, I get the error message which says that it hasn’t been filtered and that there’s no 0.0 in the donor group.
How do I filter the metadata in a way that it can still be inputted into the pairways analysis?
(that will remove rows that say “donor” anywhere in the row, and output a new metadata file that you can use… whether or not that works for the pairwise-differences command in the context of the data you are inputting I do not know so you may need to adjust this… also note it is case-sensitive so may need to be adjusted )