Differences in depths of taxonomic assignments within dataset?

[Nicholas_Bokulich]

Hi @Nick,
Thanks for posting!

@Nick

the taxon labels seem to not be consistent, even if the assignment is down to the same taxonomic depth.

This is not an issue with consistency or anything in QIIME2, but a quirk in Greengenes annotations as discussed in this post. The one feature can only be classified to family level. The other feature is successfully classified to species level, but to a taxon that has no genus or species level affiliation.

@Nick

I’m doing some downstream analysis in R using phyloseq, and I think I may run into some issues with taxonomic ranks if some taxonomic assignments have additional labelling

One solution is to collapse to a taxonomic level of interest. E.g., you can collapse at species level — any features classified to these groups would then be collapsed into a single feature. The taxonomic label containing g__;s__ would be unchanged, but the other label (only classified to f__Ruminococcaceae) would become:
k__Bacteria; p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; __; __

Because the empty levels automatically become filled out.

@Nick

Is the solution to export the taxonomy file to .tsv (which I’m already doing to create a phyloseq-importable .biom file), and then make the taxonomic labeling consistent (i.e. add "p__; c__; o__; etc all the way down to s__;)?

Yes, that would be the only other solution if you need even taxonomic labels in phyloseq and collapsing features is a problem.

I hope that helps!