ANCOM-BC barplot interpretation

Hello everyone.
I have doubts regarding the interpretation of data in ANCOM-BC in the barplot, with 16S metabarcoding data.
If I wanted to evaluate the significant taxa by testing several variables and see which taxa are significant at different times, as in this case:

qiime composition ancombc
--i-table table_16S.qza
--m-metadata-file Metadata.txt
--p-formula ‘A+B+TIME’
--p-reference-levels TIME::T0 \
--o-differentials data.qza

But I get the files to display, as if they were analysed 1 single metadata at a time. i need the aggregated result.
So I tried this with *:

qiime composition ancombc
--i-table table_16S.qza
--m-metadata-file Metadata.txt
--p-formula ‘A* B * TIME’
--p-reference-levels TIME::T0
--o-differentials data.qza
But it gives me the error --> An error was encountered while running ANCOM-BC in R (return code 1), please inspect stdout and stderr to learn more. Parsing the error, it tells me --> Error: No residual degrees of freedom! The model is over-parameterized
A more parsimonious model is needed.

I hope this was clear and helpful.
Thanks in advance.

Welcome to the forums @Giacomo_Sinesi :qiime2:

Error: No residual degrees of freedom! The model is over-parameterized

Can you tell us how many samples you have in total?
and also with each of the A and B and TIME categories?
and also within the A+B+TIME

You could also post all those columns from your Metadata.txt file.

Hopefully this is a simple statistical blocking error!

Thank you for your kind reply.
I have 3 different types of food matrices, analysed together. in total I have 60 samples (3 matrices x 20 each). I did 2 ancom-bc tests, 1 on the total 60 samples and 1 test on the samples analysed separately (20 samples). I got the same error with both and had originally done this test to see if the problem was having them analysed separately.
The metadata are common to all the samples. Two treatments were carried out on them.
The metadata columns are as follows: SampleID, A (first treatment, categoriacal metadata), B (second treatment, categorical metadata), Time (times 0, 7, 18, 21, 27, numerica metadata).

I hope I have made the idea clear.

I think so... :thinking:

Are you able to share these meta columns? I think I could identify this really quickly if I looked at it.

You can also share this file with me through a direct message
(Click on my name then choose "Message")