# q2-ANCOM versus R-ANCOM-2

**URL:** https://forum.qiime2.org/t/q2-ancom-versus-r-ancom-2/12834
**Category:** Other Bioinformatics Tools
**Created:** [December 11, 2019, 5:06am UTC](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/q2-ancom-versus-r-ancom-2/12834 "2019-12-11T05:06:39Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mehrbod\_Estaki](https://forum.qiime2.org/user_avatar/forum.qiime2.org/mehrbod_estaki/32/4001_2.png) [@Mehrbod\_Estaki](https://forum.qiime2.org/u/Mehrbod_Estaki)
#### Post date: [December 11, 2019, 6:28am UTC](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/q2-ancom-versus-r-ancom-2/12834/2 "2019-12-11T06:28:40Z")

</div>

Hi @bsen2018,  
Thanks for the update and link!

> [@bsen2018](#):
>
> I noticed some weird outputs from the q2-ANCOM,

Just in case your weird outputs were related to low W values wrongly being identified as significant, this [thread](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/ancom-low-w-taxa-identified-as-significant-issues-workaround-ancom2-code-instructions/6040) may shed some light on that.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/q2-ancom-versus-r-ancom-2/12834)._
