# Are full length 16S bespoke taxonomy references ok to use on specific regions?

**URL:** https://forum.qiime2.org/t/are-full-length-16s-bespoke-taxonomy-references-ok-to-use-on-specific-regions/12149
**Category:** Library Support
**Tags:** clawback
**Created:** [October 24, 2019, 3:49am UTC](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/are-full-length-16s-bespoke-taxonomy-references-ok-to-use-on-specific-regions/12149 "2019-10-24T03:49:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nicholas\_Bokulich](https://forum.qiime2.org/user_avatar/forum.qiime2.org/nicholas_bokulich/32/19937_2.png) [@Nicholas\_Bokulich](https://forum.qiime2.org/u/Nicholas_Bokulich)
#### Post date: [March 20, 2020, 2:57pm UTC](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/are-full-length-16s-bespoke-taxonomy-references-ok-to-use-on-specific-regions/12149/5 "2020-03-20T14:57:21Z")

</div>

A post was split to a new topic: [training classifiers: performance of full-length vs. extract-reads](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/training-classifiers-performance-of-full-length-vs-extract-reads/14138)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.qiime2.org/t/are-full-length-16s-bespoke-taxonomy-references-ok-to-use-on-specific-regions/12149)._